The deficit amounts to 1.4 billion francs a year IV. For seven years, the VAT will be increased, which annually brings in approximately 1.1 billion francs. That's still a shortfall of around 300,000 francs per year. In addition, the IV has launched 13 billion franc debt (the AVS). These will be "frozen", ie the given IV gets 5 billion francs from the OASI and he takes over the federal government interest. According to my calculations, then remain still 8 billion franc debt. Summa Sumarum makes the turn after the seven years of 10.4 billion francs debt (without interest) with a constant effort.
After the IV deficits since 1993 and writes the Parliament has not managed in 16 years (!) but this important insurance reform so that we can afford and wants the federal government to revisit to seven years. The bill we pay: The VAT is the anti-social control that exist, especially as they advance as a consumption tax hits families that have now consumed just once. Companies will simply pass that tax. In addition, the Parliament has defied its own laws in that it has amended the federal decision later on this matter outside the time limit. This VAT increase will
genaus be temporary, as the military control in 1940 on the duration of the 2nd World War II period and transferred seamlessly introduced in 1984 in the federal tax was - we pay today.
For this reason we must reject this submission: Our parliamentarians should only be made to reform and IV we present a sustainable package for the eradication of debt. The federal government needs to learn that we no longer swallow such illegal Mogelpakete. We also have to defend against today as a precaution Compared with European VAT rates by up to 25%.
Blogger colleague MM sums it up beautifully together :
Thus, the voters ask only whether one can actually give an operator who produces at the edge of the abyss, seven years for the strategy development. Or if you do not force the management to must act immediately, in which one freezes the funds (12 billion Swiss francs a year).
